For years, my main antenna was the longest piece of wire I could string out the window. I tuned it using an LC tuner, which worked OK most of the time. (The piece of wire I had strung out the window of the Priory in Stellenbosch was hi-Z on 21MHz, the capacitor arced at anything more than 2W output, but I still managed to work South America).
Wire antennas give the highest price/performance ratio of all.
I came across a design for an "all wave" dipole fed with two parallel sections of RG-58 coax. Each side of the dipole is 27 feet long, and so is the feedline. WB1GFH states that this antenna / feedline combo is a bad idea, even though it worked well enough for me. (A 40m G5RV uses about half this feedline length.)
In general,
Wavelength (in meters) λ = 300/f(MHz)
When it comes to antenna lengths, however, there are various factors that influence things, with the result that the following equations are more common :
Dipole : L = 143/f(MHz) or L = kλ/2, k=0.953
Inverted V : L = 148/f(MHz) or L = kλ/2, k=0.987
NEC http://users.tpg.com.au/users/ldbutler/SingleCoilZMatch.htm http://ac6v.com/antprojects.htm http://www.w5gi.com/mysteryantenna.htm
| Wire Guages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| awg | swg | mm | awg | swg | mm | |
| - | 47 | 0.05 | 24 | 25 | 0.5 | |
| 38 | 42 | 0.1 | 23 | 23 | 0.6 | |
| 35 | 38 | 0.15 | 21 | 22 | 0.7 | |
| 32 | 36 | 0.2 | 20 | 21 | 0.8 | |
| 30 | 33 | 0.25 | 19 | 20 | 0.9 | |
| 29 | 31 | 0.3 | 18 | 19 | 1.0 | |
| 27 | 29 | 0.35 | 12 | 14 | 2.0 | |
| 26 | 27 | 0.4 | 9 | 11 | 3.0 | |
| 25 | 26 | 0.45 | 6 | 8 | 4.0 |
Well, a web search turned up W5DXP's page where he explains the whole thing with a graph.
54 ft dipole is (54/936)*14.1 = 0.8 wavelengths, match = 0.3
K0JD reports that he's running 50 watts through a balun consisting of three turns on an Amidon BN-43-3312 core. This core is 19.5 x 9.5 x 25.5 mm with two 5mm holes through it -- tiny by my standards, and I certainly would not have thought that it would handle 50 watts.
|
|
Back to ZS1KE main Page | (This page last modified 2004-03-16) |