Waybackwhen the Firearms Control Act of 2000 was drafted, they couldn’t decide whether they should licence the person or the firearm. So they did what any committee would do — they chose both.

Which leaves us with the situation where you can be fully “competent” to own, say, a handgun, but then be denied the licence for said handgun because you didn’t prove to the registrar that you “need” it.

If you want more than two handguns or four firearms in total, you need to be a “dedicated” [hunter|sports shooter|collector]. This basically means joining an accredited organisation and jumping through whatever hoops said organisation choses to make their members prove their dedication. This can be as easy as attending four meetings or shooting four matches a year. Once you are a “dedicated” individual it becomes much easier to obtain a licence for a firearm appropriate to the organisation you are “dedicated” with. After all, if you are “competent” and have a letter from the chairman saying you need a semi-auto rifle* for 3 gun shoots or as a collector or whatever it’s really difficult for them to deny the licence.

So when I went through the rigmarole I obtained competency for handgun, rifle and shotgun. You have to prove you know the law and that you know how to make the gun go bang in such a way that you can broadly hit what you’re aiming at. I suspect that at the time there was no Unit Standard for semi-automatic rifles, or maybe it was a security business only thing, but whatever, I didn’t do the “self-loading rifle” competency.

Until yesterday, that is. Because they’re sitting on a licence application for a Browning semi-auto 22, and the only possible reason they might not give me the licence is that I don’t have this specific competency (this is not how we read the law, but our police are well known for their creative interpretation of the Law & Regs as well as their point of view that if you don’t like it you’re more than welcome to take the matter to court (where they will defend themselves using your tax money)).

And more importantly, I want to apply for a licence for a Garand, because why I can.

So I bought the book a few months ago, from Parow Arms & Ammo. Completed the open book exam, made an appointment, was handed a closed book exam asking the easy half of the questions from the open book exam, exchanged that for a competency certificate they had printed the week before, and then had to put ten shots into an A5 paper target at 10m with a Norinco LM4 (I think).

I’ve heard that one can fail the competency but if you do you should probably have someone help you with the shoelaces thing in the morning as well.

* Semi-auto rifles are “restricted”. Means only thpethial people can licence them. Fully automatic firearms are “prohibited”. This doesn’t mean what Merriam-Webster thinks it means. It means that only vewy vewy thpethial people can licence them. Collectors and film props guys, basically.


4 Comments to “Much more competenterer”


  1. Viv — 2011-08-17 @ 12:15

    Oh, but we all know that you are vewy vewy thpethial *wink*

  2. Juan A Be The Luchador — 2011-08-18 @ 21:54

    time to move

  3. wrm — 2011-08-22 @ 12:56

    >time to move

    Sadly, there are few countries with better gun laws. The Chech republic, maybe. Or USA, of course.

    But I have many guns I won’t be allowed to take with me into the USA. Baby Brownings — those things are dangerous, man — or so the US Government thinks.

    Also, here, suppressors are unregulated. In the USA they’re regarded as a threat to society, or maybe just a handy revenue stream.

    So I’m afraid “time to move” is not a feasible solution :-P

  4. Wouter's Blog » Blog Archive » Even more competenter — 2013-02-26 @ 09:01

    [...] the general setup is still the same. Get the book, read through it, do the open book exam at the back. Pitch at the venue, write a [...]



Write a comment